Anyone with a significant background within the mental health system can attest to its importance. It’s true for those of us who have an academic background in psychology. And it’s often just as true for people who have been treated for complex conditions for a significant period of time. These two groups might not seem to have much in common at first. But this familiarity with the system means more than is readily apparent at first glance.
People often think of mental health as a perfect mental analog for physical health. But the diagnostics and treatment for mental health issues are surprisingly complex in comparison. The main problem is that one can’t simply jump into someone’s brain in order to effect repairs. Mental health is a field full of educated guesses and continued application of treatments in hopes that one might be the perfect match. And for better or worse, a lot depends on the mental health professional in charge of a patient’s treatment.
The person providing treatment and the person receiving it need to have some measure of compatibility. But this is often complicated by patients who relate to treatment differently than the average person. Again, the two most common examples are people with a higher than average amount of experience with therapy. On top of this, the needs of people with a dual diagnosis or a combination of physical and mental health issues can push someone even further outside of a medical professional’s reach.
There are methods to get around this problem though. For example, consider someone in Creekside. She might have heard about a company such as creekside collaborative therapy and decided to give it a try. She’d had a rough time with therapy before since she has a B.S. in psychology. Even though she never went into it professionally, her background tends to block progress during therapy. She finds herself critiquing the therapist’s approach or background rather than working with her own issues.
But here we see her exploring other options. And this is the best way to make progress with one’s mental health issues. If something isn’t working, it’s best to keep on looking. In this case we see her approaching something which operates based on the idea of a hermeneutic circle.
Hermeneutic circle theory states that one needs full understanding of a system in order to understand the individual components. Likewise, one needs to understand the components to understand the whole. It’s an approach which starts with what’s essentially a blank slate. The therapist looks to the patient to provide information about her experience and needs. This allows the therapist to work with mental structures constructed by the patient’s needs rather than his own. In short, it’s a collaborative approach to therapy.
By collaborating it’s often possible for people with more complex backgrounds to get the help they need. In traditional therapy a complex background can impede treatment. But in the case of collaborative therapy it can help progress by providing novelty and sparking creative discussion. Like all forms of therapy, it’s best looked at as one tool among many. But the larger point is that everyone can find help with mental health issues. It’s often just a process of finding the right tool for the problem at hand.